Oculus (2014) Review

Oculus (2014) Review

Director – Mike Flanagan

Stars – Karen Gillan, Brenton Thwaites

Over 2 years after initial filming was complete Oculus has nearly arrived in cinemas across the globe. It has been a long time coming for Director Mike Flanagan who seems to have made it a lifelong ambition for it to be made, as he also worked on a TV movie Version back in 2006. This time round he is equipped with $5 million budget and a cast led by Karen Gillan (a veteran with monsters/supernatural beings/ dodgy BBC CGI) after her outings with Doctor Who.

The film’s premise is based on a mirror with supernatural powers which over the centuries has made people slaughter their friends, families, pets, ect. Flanagan uses an interesting technique of showing us the past and present life’s of Kaylie (Gillan) and her brother Tim (Thwaites) as they struggle to cope with what has happened. As we pan backwards and forwards between their childhood and present we begin to uncover a story of horror and gore. The film grabs us in the first half as tension builds and builds where we see the two attempting to destroy the supernatural being whilst facing what happened to their family at the mirrors hands (sounds great right?). It’s around the hour mark where we begin to wish that we had just watched something else. The rest of the film is dull, predictable and simply doesn’t satisfy. All the small cleaver details that gripped us seem wasted as the film ends abruptly with no real conclusion to whatever the hell just happened in the first place. However Gillan is the film’s saving grace, she manages to guide us past all the small hiccups and bland camera work and even makes us wish there was more room for her character without a killer mirror.

Although this film seems to be another attempt to cash in on the supernatural movie market its clear to see that Flanagan holds it dear. There are some small touches that really work, especially in the childhood scenes where we get a Paranormal Activity vibe. With that said this B Movie doesn’t make a mark against a competitive horror genre. Its dull script makes it hard for us to care at all about the characters on screen and by the time the big reveal is upon us it’s too late to win us back. Oculus unfortunately isn’t a film that will keep you up all night if anything it will do the opposite.

RATING - 2/5

Bad Neighbours (2014) Review

Bad Neighbours (2014) Review

Director - Nicholas Stoller

Stars – Seth Rogen, Rose Byrne, Zac Efron

Nicholas Stoller is probably best known as a director of features such as Forgetting Sarah Marshall and Get Him To The Greek, films instantly associated with actors such as Jonah Hill, Jason Segel and basically anyone else that has worked with either Judd Apatow or Evan Goldberg. It therefore comes as little surprise that he would choose to direct a film starring Seth Rogen (amongst other familiar associates), complete with more dick jokes than you could possibly imagine. But there is more to be said for Bad Neighbours than what is suggested by this.

  Mac (Seth Rogen) and Kelly (Rose Byrne) are the couple who have just begun to settle into family life when all semblance of normality is destroyed by the arrival of a frat house moving in next door. The unruly college students are led by an idiotic yet charismatic Teddy (Zac Efron) accompanied by equally absurd right-hand man Pete (Dave Franco). Despite an initially warm first encounter, an inevitable turf war ensues resulting in plotting and scheming on both sides of the fence. Penis jokes aside, the film takes care to give a degree of depth to its characters, giving Rose Byrne a surprising amount of scope as the new mother reluctant to adjust to the routines of family life. Rogen performs his usual slacker shtick in a way that works well in the context of a grown man who still doesn’t quite know how to be a responsible father. Zac Efron’s character is also more than just the obnoxious frat boy, displaying an element of compassion whilst ensuring the unity of ‘Delta Si’ in a bizarre and somewhat contradictory notion of “Bro-hood”. One particular scene that demonstrates this involves a fantastic appearance from Craig Roberts (of Submarine fame) aka ‘assjuice’, proof that the film’s funniest moments are often produced from its more minor characters. As an actor who has been involved in some painfully unfunny films (That Awkward Moment was just plain awkward), Efron is brilliant in Bad Neighbours through embodying everything equally terrible yet redeemable about being a frat boy.

If you enjoy watching college debauchery in all its absurdity along with routine performances from funny-men like Seth Rogen then Bad Neighbours will tick all the boxes. Unfortunately the film will do little to stand out from the Canadian’s earlier work like The 40 Year Old Virgin, Knocked Up, and Superbad. Despite a more interesting plot, the film’s obsession with giggling at the male anatomy becomes a little tiresome – not to mention blowing its load of decent gags in the trailer.

RATING 3/5

By Tom Boucher

Her (2013) Review

Her (2014) Review

Director – Spike Jonze

Stars - Joaquin Phoenix, Scarlett Johansson, Amy Adams

Spike Jonze normally spends several years between directing major productions, one might believe that this is because he has his hands full, writing and producing various other Hollywood pictures. Or you could suggest that it’s because he only takes on films that have personal meaning to him. His last full feature was 2009’s ‘Where the Wild Things are’ which was a great piece of cinema. Ever since he has spent his time playing small roles in a handful of big budget features (The Wolf of Wall Street (2013) and Money Ball (2012)) and making short films. Jonze had seemingly disappeared off the radar until the news of ‘Her’ surfaced and we first glimpsed that pink poster, the movie making legend had returned.

The film is set in near future LA where a lonely Theodore (Phoenix) has bought into a new A.I operating system called Samantha voiced by Johansson who creates the invisible companion ‘Her’. Among the blank skyscrapers and block coloured clothes that everyone in LA seem to be wearing (American Apparel are probably raking it in) we follow Theodore’s developing relationship with this perfectly voiced machine, and old love affairs which include his ex-wife Catherine (Rooney Mara) who makes her small part pivotal in emphasising what Samantha does best; make Theodore happy. As each scene rolls past we notice that every shot is perfectly placed and gives us a wonderful view of this man’s life. From his day job writing nostalgia filled letters between families, friends and lovers to his plain apartment in one of the towering buildings in central L.A. We are also given comedy; when Theodore plays a virtual game he comes across the best animated invention ever, in the form of a foul mouthed blob-like creature who insults Theodore’s choice in women. This in turn provides relief from what might have been a fairly monotone film. Another crucial part of the film is making Samantha’s existence meaningful as she begins to discover things for the first time and becomes self aware. Even though we don’t get to see Samantha’s face we don’t need to, it makes it better that we can imagine our own perfect companion, which is the whole point; Although Theodore craves to escape loneliness its Samantha that longs to feel the touch of another person, which in turn mirrors Theodore’s solemn tone at the beginning.

'Her’ has been seen by many critics as a question about our over dependence on technology, but it is so much more than this. Although it was widely overlooked at this year’s Oscars for various titles which included Best film, best score and best song (Let it go by frozen won which makes it worse), this film is a modern great. It’s nothing short of genius. Amy Adams' amazing performance helps to make sense of Theodore’s relationship with Samantha whilst we follow every twist and turn that they face in a society reliant on constant contact. In short this film is a masterpiece, Jonze has made something unique and special that everyone should see. 

RATING 5/5

Big Bad Wolves (2014) Review

Big Bad Wolves (2014)

Directors – Aharon Keshales and Navot Papushado

Stars – Lior Ashenazi, Rotem Keinan, Tzahi Grad

Israeli cinema isn’t commonly seen in mainstream western cinema; however this deeply black comedy horror surpasses pretty much everything in its genre in recent years. After appearing over the course of a year at various indie festivals it managed to transfer to screens across the U.S in large part to Quentin Tarantino stating it is ‘The best film of the year’. This set the goal post fairly high considering Mr Tarantino knows a thing or two about cinema. It also indicts the films themes; violence and gore, seeing as we’re pretty sure he doesn’t watch anything without these two elements. The film centres around three characters: a corrupt policeman who is investigating a string of grizzly child murders, the father of the latest victim and the main suspect.

From the opening shot of children playing in a derelict house we can sense a solemn tone that carries throughout the film, it’s an eerie atmosphere that makes the steady pace even more captivating. As we begin to see each character’s story we get a sense of the strong complexity of their roles within the film. Micki (Ashkenazi) the Policeman is a man who has strong family values yet will torment and stalk Dror (Keinan) the main suspect who is also a school teacher, and after being shunned from his job because of these accusations he also has to take abuse and beatings from others. It isn’t until we are introduced to Gidi (Grad) the father of the latest victim when things start to ramp up. The film's real trick is determining Dror’s innocence or guilt and whether the lengths we see Gidi and Micki go to are morally right.

The film makes clever use of the script providing moments of light comic relief especially between Gidi and his elderly father as they discuss torturing Dror. This in turn makes these following scenes much darker as the men begin to inflict hammer blows and blowtorch burns upon the suspect. As an audience we’re not sheltered from the breaking of fingers or indeed any bloodshed. It uses elements of ‘Hostel’ (2005) without going overboard, as the build up to the first painful attack is thoughtfully prolonged.  As the second half of the film continues, the suspense mounts as the story twists and turns until eventually we arrive at a shattering finish. In the final shot you almost shout out with shock with the conclusion you are faced with. What really makes this film great is the well rounded characters, played by an amazing cast. Quentin wasn’t wrong.

RATING – 3/5

By Joshua Tanner

X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014) Review

X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014) Review

Director – Bryan Singer

Stars – Hugh Jackman, Jennifer Lawrence, Nicholas Hoult, Patrick Stewart

When Singer announced shortly after the release of X-Men: First Class that the next X-Men film would be a crazed mash up of old and new, many people were hesitant. It’s a bold idea and one that plays well. We see the original X: Men cast that we grew up watching combining with the recent incarnations; as Wolverine (Jackman) is sent back in time to stop a war that will wipe out humans and mutants from ever beginning. The feel of the film is defiantly more like ‘First Class’ than the originals, as it has more of an edge to it rather than the trilogy’s fun feel. It also makes sure not to mention the awful stand alones that Mr Jackman decided he would take on. With this in mind it has the combination to be a great success, each cast member was as excited to be back as the rest of us and with Singer at the helm we were in familiar territories.

The Film begins well, we are thrown straight into the action as we see old faces including Ellen Page’s Kitty battling it out in the future against Peter Dinklage’s Sentinels. These Sentinels have the power to adapt to any mutant’s power in order to beat them, and so we see the perilous situation faced by Professor X and the gang from the word go. Without over complicating things in the story we are sent back to the 70’s where we can reunite again with the younger mutant’s who are faced with their own problems. After we are introduced to each member the story can finally progress as our heroes plan to free Michael Fassbender from his cage in the Pentagon. Aided by newcomer Quicksilver we are given great action sequences and great acting. Singer makes these sequences combine well with the heightened tension as we cross back from and forth between past and present. With major set pieces including stadiums crashing around the white house and a slow motion battle set to classical music being a major highlight. Another thing that Singer does well is making the characters use their powers together to make these moments that more effective. However that said the only thing that lacks is the character development, with a great story that is never boring it manages to sacrifices it’s key players. We never see much of Ian McClellan nor Ellen Page, and even when we do they aren’t able to grab enough screen time to help us remember what they have been doing when the last film ended. We are hurried along the story with each character attempting to make the most of their moment, even though they are great to watch they are left feeling somewhat hollow and disjointed.

Singer does his best to provide drama and action and it works, well. It’s great to see his big ideas play out and unfold in front of us. Jackman is a predictably sturdy lead who navigates us along at a great pace, whilst the supporting roles are filled with A list talent who manage to cement themselves within the X-Men universe. Singer’s well written script and amazing fight sequences make Days of Future Past is a crowd pleaser, and we are even treated to some old faces making cameos at the end. With this in mind and the next instalment X-Men-Apocalypse fast approaching it’s going to be a spectacular comeback for the franchise, let’s just hope we get to see more of the characters we have learnt to love.

RATING 4/5

By Joshua Tanner

Nymphomaniac (2014) Review

Nymphomaniac (2014) Review

Director – Lars Von Trier

Stars – Charlotte Gainsbourg, Stacy Martin, Stellan Skarsgard

Lars Von Trier is a Danish Director notorious for making extremely controversial films that generate powerful audience responses. After watching Von Trier’s harrowing, semi-pornographic ‘The Idiots’ as well as the vicious diatribe against American society that is ‘Dogville’, his latest effort is would presumably be shocking. So with a four hour long film divided into two parts documenting the life of a woman suffering from sex addiction, there was no disappointment on the shock factor. Charlotte Gainsbourg is fantastic as the troubled, self-deprecating ‘Joe’, as is promising newcomer Stacey Martin, who plays the character in her younger years. Another long-time Von Trier collaborator Stellan Skarsgard is brilliant as the asexual intellectual ‘Seligman’, who rescues a beaten-up Joe, bringing her back to his house where we hear the troubled woman’s life story through her large variety of sexual encounters. As you can imagine, this is not easy viewing in the slightest; with frequent graphic sex scenes and brutal S&M violence, it goes without saying that this is a film you DO NOT want take your parents to. Although scenes such as these occur throughout, it has to be said that part 1 of the film makes for more comfortable viewing than part 2, where we are introduced to the menacing yet calculated ‘K’, a master of sadomasochism expertly played by Jamie Bell. The only casting decision that throws up a serious question mark is Shia Labeouf, as Joe’s lover, Jerome. Although Labeouf hasn't proved to be an irritating on-screen presence in the past, his shocking British accent manages to cover Australian, South African and bad cockney pronunciation in the space of one sentence. The actor’s murdering of vowels only seemed to add to the absurdity of the film but in an entirely negative way. That said, there are some brave, yet astounding performances all round; Uma Thurman’s hysterical pantomime of the wronged wife is equally hilarious yet moving.

It is important to note that amongst all of the physical and emotional turmoil that the film depicts, there are some very interesting and powerful notions raised about misogyny, feminism, promiscuity and sexuality. These notions are deftly raised by the curious interplay between Joe and Seligman, a meeting of two extremely contrasting minds that produces some very humorous moments. This is a film that will make you speechless as you gasp, laugh and despair at such madness presented before your very eyes. I do personally believe however that such a film can achieve its aims in a shorter running time – I dread to think what the 5-hour original cut is like! Lars Von Trier is unmistakably bold yet frustrating as a filmmaker from an audience perspective; his films are ceaselessly provocative, complex and deeply psychological – Nymphomaniac is arguably most accomplished in this sense. It’s just a shame that whenever I watch a Von Trier film, I usually feel the need to go sit in a darkened room in an attempt to restore my sanity.

RATING 3/5

By Tom Boucher

The Grand Budapest Hotel (2014) Review

The Grand Budapest Hotel (2014)

Director - Wes Anderson

Stars – Ralph Fiennes, Adrien Brody, Tony Revolori

Wes Anderson is a director whose idiosyncratic style is instantly recognisable: from his relentlessly detailed use of props and set design, symmetrical shots and accompaniment of classical music combined with 60’s pop, fans of his would hold his latest effort with a degree of expectation. With this in mind, Anderson’s eighth feature fails to disappoint, greeting us with stunningly meticulous detail of a small European setting overlooked by two World Wars. The Grand Budapest Hotel is a nostalgic tale of the infamous concierge Gustave H (Fiennes) told by his loyal lobby boy Zero, admirably played by the largely unknown Tony Revolori. Set in the fictional Republic of Zubrowka, the luxurious Grand Budapest provides the initial setting for an adventure narrative, complete with heists, prison breaks, secret romances and elaborate chase sequences. Fiennes is a fantastic addition to Anderson’s usual casting outfit - his pompous yet charismatic Gustave is equally humorous and engrossing. The familiar faces of Bill Murray, Edward Norton and Jason Schwartzman also provide colour to an already vibrant story through their minor roles.

Those who have seen Anderson’s previous films will be aware of his continual use of certain actors. However this film’s ensemble cast has so many memorable names that it’s hard not to keep grinning all the way through from Schwartzman’s useless hotel worker through to Harvey Keitel’s hardened criminal. The way in which these variety of star turns are managed helps successfully draw the audience into the fictional world of Zubrowka, an impressive feat that’s already achieved by the director’s keen eye for detail. This envelopment into a fictional landscape is not only entertaining but is something Anderson hasn't quite achieved thus far, setting The Grand Budapest Hotel apart from his other films.

It’s true that the films of Wes Anderson have been deemed by some to be overtly stylised and self-indulgent in the past; it’s also true that The Grand Budapest will do little to change the minds of those who can’t tolerate the director’s recurring tropes. But fans and detractors alike would agree that the narratives Anderson presents are undeniably enjoyable. The director’s latest film is a fantastic example of this, giving his audience a film that’s thoroughly engaging through the art of storytelling alone.

RATING 5/5

By Tom Boucher

The Two Faces of January (2014) Review

The Two Faces of January (2014) Review

Director – Hossein Amini

Stars – Viggo Mortensen Kirsten Dunst, Oscar Isaac.

Written as a novel by Patricia Highsmith The Two Faces of January seems to borrow from the same kind of nostalgia as her other books, mainly ‘The Talented Mr Ripley’ (1999). From this alone we can gather many of the film’s themes; betrayal, murder and false pretences which Highsmith has successfully used time and again. With the back drop of 1960’s Greece we are given various glances over ancient ruins highlighted by the sweltering heat. The plot centres on Colette (Dunst) and Chester (Mortensen) as a couple on the run from police with Isaac’s Rydal acting as an accomplice to their travels after he is caught up in the mess. The film has first time director Hossein Amini at the helm after previous writing duties on ‘Drive’ (2011) and ‘Snow White and the Huntsman’ (2012).

From the beginning we see the happy relationship between a confident Collette (Dunst) and suave but older Chester (Mortensen) disrupted after Chester murders a private detective. Witnessing this Rydal (Isaac) begins to help them avoid capture, but to what end?  As they travel across Greece we begin to see Rydal and Collette become closer whilst Chester watches on jealousy. What makes the film interesting is that from the beginning we don’t meet any other major characters apart from these three. In doing so we get a semi – claustrophobic atmosphere that gradually begins to make each of these people act against one another. Driven by separate motives, an ever growing pace is set which plays out extremely effectively. We get glamorous horizon views of the scenery and hand held camera chase sequences in rustic ruins. The film does well to keep us on the edge of our seats as each character clamours to get out in time.

One of the films great elements is the casting. Isaac is likable as an American tour guide who becomes intensely obsessed with Collette, whilst Mortensen plays a sterner man with purpose in his stride, both men attempting to gain freedom whilst yearning to be with Colette. The films only downfall is its vast pace, it chases to the end of the story without really making the most of each characters decisions. However in saying this each actor brings intensity and intrigue into the people they create, whilst Amini is able to steer us to a climatic finish. All in all the film is about two sides of a person and how they cope with others in order to survive. It delivers on the drama but it would have been great to have made more of the script.

RATING 4/5 

The Amazing Spider Man 2 (2014) Review

The Amazing Spider Man 2 (2014)

Director – Marc Webb

Stars – Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Jamie Foxx, Dane Dehaan

Marc Webb and the gang came swinging back to NYC this year for the second outing of Sony’s Spidey Quadrilogy. After 2 years Marc Webb’s second attempt to helm this re-booted franchise boasted a triple threat of villains, oddly ‘Spiderman 3’ (2007) had the same formula and was a box office flop. Much of the viral campaign gave us the impression that Foxx’s Electro was the main foe amongst the rabble, but how would this all play out?

It turns out, not great. The film’s biggest mistake is not giving Paul Giamatti (Rhino) enough screen time, he is able to offer a least 3 audible sentences before being shunned (most likely to come back in Marvels forthcoming ‘Sinister Six’) The film starts with a prologue to Peter’s parents death then back into the love story with Gwen Stacey (Stone). In this sense the film works perfectly, we can see Webb’s previous work ‘(500) Days of Summer’ (2009) shinning through, nostalgia and sunshine are awash. Unfortunately this is one of only a few moments that keep the film afloat. As we get into the story we are introduced to a variety of characters all over the place and again we don’t get the satisfaction of seeing Max (Foxx) spiral into evil. We get the predictable Spider man wit and American Patriotism which all seems slightly forced. The film does take a turn for the better when we meet Harry Osborn (Dehaan), who as we all guessed would eventually become the Green Goblin. His suave attitude and hipster look is a far cry from James Franco’s interpretation and you get the sense that Dehaan really enjoys the role.

As the film progresses we are given more action sequences around central Manhattan, this is where we can begin to enjoy the grand set pieces, notably the final battle where we first see the new Green Goblin, bolstered by some great sound effects in the way of dub step explosions and choir voices singing the original Spider man theme supposedly within Electro's head. This climax has been the greatest so far for Webb, although it doesn’t rival the previous outings back in the 2000’s. Garfield will forever be pitted against Tobey Maguire and although they bring different approaches it’s easier to like Maguire’s shy and genuinely likable Spider man to Garfield’s popular jock stereotype. With this in mind Webb’s film desperately tries to break free of the previous incarnations but to no avail.

Although the film doesn't disappoint it doesn't impress either. It takes great care to ensure that the audience is spoon fed information about each individual story arch, and it lacks the emotional attachment that the previous films seemed to hold dear. Webb’s vision is simple and effective as a standard Blockbuster, but don’t we want it to be so much more? Listen to Uncle Ben next time guys ‘With great power...’

RATING 2/5

Film Facts:

-         

             - Andrew Garfield bought a pirate DVD of the original ‘Spider man’ before its release because he was such a fan.

-          

            - Shailene Woodley was cast as Mary – Jane Watson but was cut from the movie; she will appear in the third instalment.

-         

           -  Paul Giamatti had always wanted the role of ‘Rhino’.

-          

     - It’s the largest film production ever in New York

Godzilla (2014) Review

Godzilla (2014)

Director – Gareth Edwards

Stars – Aaron Taylor – Johnson, Bryan Cranston, Ken Watanabe, Elizabeth Olsen

Back in 2010 Edwards made ‘Monsters’ on a shoestring budget, 1 camera, 2 unknown actors and 3 plane tickets to Mexico, after several months his small indie debut hit the big time. He was given what any aspiring director wants; the keys to Hollywood. After talks and casting, Godzilla was green lit and on its way. After all he was a good man to trust, his first film was able to show characters with great depth and meaning whilst the actual Monsters were as impressive as the build up to the moment when we saw them. With this in mind and after seeing the first teaser trailer (The halo jump) the scene was set for Godzilla to be a triumph.

Edwards begins the film well with a slow burn approach using his actors alongside an amazing score to create tension and suspense. However as we descend into the second act the story seems slightly muddled and lost, Aaron Taylor Johnson and Olsen have two scenes together in the whole film and it’s hard to care about them when Bryan Cranston is onscreen stealing every moment he’s in the frame. This alone isn't bad; it’s the fact that we don’t see the titular character for the majority of the 2^nd act. Edwards intended this to be the case, wanting the audience to expect his arrival at any moment and when he does for him to start smashing everything up. But what we get instead are two ‘Muto’s’ Insect like creatures that spend a lot of time walking and flying around America causing havoc whilst Godzilla waits at the bottom of the Pacific apparently. This was interesting as by the end of the film you realize you haven’t actually seen much of Godzilla, instead we've spent the majority of the time watching Aaron Taylor Johnston visit Japan, Hawaii and San Francisco whilst Muto’s wander around eating radiation (which they use as a food source.)

However when we do finally see Godzilla there is a moment of awe, the signature roar blasts over the speakers and once again your hooked. The impressive budget of $160 million creates some impressive CGI, which is as expected. Yet after all this waiting around it doesn't have a lasting impression, as building after building falls you begin to wonder where Ken Watanabe has gone and if he’s going to come back and deliver some more show stopping acting? It is unfortunately not the case as he spends most of the third act in a military base and not in the center of the action.

Edwards has created a great monster with a rousing cast, it’s just a shame that they weren't used to their full potential. Still with box office takings at $9.3 million so far, there is probably going to be a sequel right? Better head to Mexico this time Gareth.

RATING 3/5